Citatio: D. Groddek, hethiter.net/: grodlist s.v. KUB 49.5 (v. 0.7)
Literatur zu KUB 49.5:
(+) Y. Sakuma, Diss., Bd. II, 742
passim E. Laroche, Hethitica 4 (1981), 54
(+) Vs.! 1-10 Y. Sakuma, Diss., Bd. II, 254
I 3 CHD Š, 110a
I 4 J. Hazenbos, Orakelfrage, 131
(= Bo 5121) Vs. 4 A. Archi, SMEA 16 (1975), 133
I 4.12.15.20 HW2 I, 281b
I 4 E. Laroche, Hethitica 4 (1981), 51
I 6.21 P. Cotticelli, Mat.heth.Thes. 11 (Nr. 8), 31
(+) I 6 HW2 V, 42a
I 7-8 J. Puhvel, HED VI, 88
I 11f. P. Cotticelli-Kurras, THeth 18, 102
I 11.16.28 J.L. Miller, StBoT 46, 390 A. 617
I 11.16 A. Ünal, FS N. Özgüç, 642
(+) Vs.! 11-15 Y. Sakuma, Diss., Bd. II, 254-255
I 11.16.28 B.H.L. van Gessel, OHP, II, 634
I 15 H. Berman, JCS 34 (1982), 119
(+) Vs.! 16-22 Y. Sakuma, Diss., Bd. II, 255-256
I 16 P. Cotticelli, Mat.heth.Thes. 11 (Nr. 8), 46
I 21f. M. Hutter, RAI 38, 221 A. 4
I 21-22 J. Tischler, HEG IV, 398
(+) Vs. 22 Y. Sakuma, Diss., Bd. II, 713
I 22 P. Cotticelli, Mat.heth.Thes. 11 (Nr. 8), 46
(+) Vs.! 23-28 Y. Sakuma, Diss., Bd. II, 256-257
I 26 HW2 I, 346b
Vs. 27 J. Hazenbos, Orakelfrage, 116, 118
Vs. 27 J. Hazenbos, Orakelfrage, 119
(= Bo 5121) Vs. 27 A. Archi, SMEA 16 (1975), 133
I 27 E. Laroche, Hethitica 4 (1981), 34
(+) Vs.! 29-33(„11-15“) Y. Sakuma, Diss., Bd. II, 2578-258
I 30 HW2 I, 264b
(+) Vs.! 34-38(„16-20“) Y. Sakuma, Diss., Bd. II, 258-259
(+) Vs.! 39(„21“) Y. Sakuma, Diss., Bd. II, 259
(+) Vs.! 40-45(„22-27“) Y. Sakuma, Diss., Bd. II, 259-260
(+) Vs.! 46-51(„28-33“) Y. Sakuma, Diss., Bd. II, 260
Gerfrid G.W. Müller -- 2008- 2025