iiiFnSymT 0  T 1 HW² III/1, 232b proposes to restore <span class='sGr'>ZAG</text:span><span class='AOHittite'>-<span class='del'>[</text:span>an</text:span> <span class='sGr'>GEŠTU</text:span><span class='AOHittite'>-an</text:span><span class='del'>]</text:span>, ‘the right ear’ in l. 3, cf. also Cotticelli-Kurras P. 1998a: 115. Clogged ears survive in the medical series sakikkû (8, 16–17; Schmidtchen E. 2021a: 402–403).
 iiiFnSymT 1  T 2 <span class='AOHittite'>⸢ḫa-ap⸣-pí-ni-ìš-ši</text:span> cannot mean ‘in his wealth/in his being rich’ as proposed by Riemschneider K.K. 2004a: 170. It is more likely to be the datice-locative of the adjective <span class='AOHittite'>ḫappina-</text:span> with a sentence-initial personal clitic.
 iiiFnSymT 2  T 3 Likely meaning the negative consequences of perjury (‘Eidluch’), cf. Christiansen B. 2012a: 125–126.
 iiiFnSymT 3  T 4 Perhaps better than ‘will become angry’, as this prediction would hardly be the peak of the diviner’s craft.
 iiiFnSymT 4  T 5 This omen couplet is found as four omens in K 8821, 16′–19′, cf. Köcher F. – Oppenheim A.L. 1957a: 74–75.
 iiiFnSymT 5  T 6 Following the sign traces and Güterbock H.G. 1957-1958a: 80, though <span class='sGr'>ZAG</text:span> would be expected because of the negative apodosis.
 iiiFnSymT 6  T 7 Similarly in the Old Babylonian tablet VAT 7525 obv. I, 33–34 (Köcher F. – Oppenheim A.L. 1957a) and in the Neo-Assyrian tablet CT 28.41, 12′–15′.
 iiiFnSymT 7  T 8 The order of this section and the following one may be reversed in the text.
 iiiFnSymT 8  T 9 For a discussion of this section, see CTH 532.6.
 iiiFnSymT 9  T 10 It is not exactly clear which paragraphs belong together. Usually, we find the right before the left side in Mesopotamian omen couplets, but paragraph one and two show an ablative, whereas §3 has a dative. Perhaps §2–3 were about something going from left to right/right to left and the scribe spaced them differently.
 iiiFnSymT 10  T 11 The reading <span class='AOHittite'>⸢pár-aš⸣-<del_in />na-az</text:span> follows Riemschneider K.K. 2004a: 154–155. Whether the word refers here to the actual cheeks, the buttocks, or the loins is unclear (cf. CHD/p 187b).
 iiiFnSymT 11  T 12 The exact form and spelling of the word in l. 3′ is unclear to me. It is likely a form of <span class='AOHittite'>antuḫša-</text:span> ‘man’, but the copy in IBoT 2.132 shows <span class='AOHittite'><span class='del'>[</text:span>a<span class='del'>]</text:span>n-tu-uḫ-⸢ša</text:span><span class='corr'>?</text:span><span class='AOHittite'>⸣-</text:span> and then a sign ending in two verticals (<span class='AOHittite'>iš</text:span>?). On the photograph available on HPM it looks like <span class='AOHittite'><span class='del'>[</text:span>a<span class='del'>]</text:span>n-tu-uḫ-⸢ḫu⸣-x</text:span>, but the last traces do not support a reading <span class='AOHittite'>-uš</text:span>.