iiiFnSym 0 1
 iiiFnSym 1 2
 iiiFnSym 2 3
 iiiFnSym 3 4
 iiiFnSym 4 5
 iiiFnSym 5 6
 iiiFnSym 6 7
 iiiFnSymT 0  T 1 Hoffner H.A. 2009a, 133 suggests <span class='sGr'>ÉRIN</text:span><span class='d'>MEŠ</text:span> is not to be intended in military sense, but rather to groups of field workers, primarily on the basis of the second part of the letter (obv. 14-15).
 iiiFnSymT 1  T 2 Based on the different reading <span class='AOHittite'><span class='del'>[</text:span>ku<span class='del'>]</text:span>-na-an</text:span>, Alp S. 1991b, 153 “<span class='del'>[</text:span>get<span class='del'>]</text:span>ötet hat”; Marizza M. 2009a, 85 “ha ucciso”.
 iiiFnSymT 2  T 3 Problematic disagreement between <span class='AOHittite'>apē</text:span> (NOM.PL.C) and <span class='AOHittite'>kuiš</text:span> (NOM.SG.C). The usage can be best explained as an agreement <span class='AO--italic'>ad sensum</text:span> between <span class='AOHittite'>kuiš … kuiš,</text:span> with generalizing meaning (“one/some” … “one/some (other)”) and the plurality of people referred to (“those”). Differently, Hoffner H.A. 2009a, 133 takes the form <span class='AOHittite'>apēya</text:span> as a local adverb (“there”).
 iiiFnSymT 3  T 4 i.e. of the people in question. Verbal noun <span class='AOHittite'>kappūwar</text:span>, probably haplology of expected <span class='AOHittite'>kappūwaūar</text:span>. Hoffner H.A. – Melchert H.C. 2008a, 1.139; also Hoffner H.A. 2009a, 133 n. 84 and Hoffner H.A. 2010c, 110.
 iiiFnSymT 4  T 5 The enclitic <span class='AOHittite'>=an</text:span> necessarily refers back to <span class='AOHittite'>kuiš</text:span>, namely each of the two groups of people mentioned in the previous lines. In order to solve the problematic agreement, Hoffner suggests an emendation of ⸢<span class='AOHittite'>na⸣-an</text:span> as <span class='sGr'>EGIR</text:span><span class='corr'>!</text:span><span class='AOHittite'>-an</text:span> (Hitt. <span class='AOHittite'>appan)</text:span>.
 iiiFnSymT 5  T 6 With Hoffner H.A. 2009a, it is implied that the oracles concern “(whether and how to proceed against him)”. It should be noted that both <span class='AOHittite'>katta ariye/a-</text:span> and <span class='AOHittite'>arḫa ariye/a-</text:span> have specific meanings in oracular texts, respectively, along the lines of “to make further oracular inquiries” and “to complete oracular inquiries” (in telic sense).
 iiiFnSymT 6  T 7 For the translation of <span class='AOHittite'>kāša</text:span> with <span class='AOHittite'>kuitman</text:span> in this passage, see Steitler Ch. 2020b, 367.
 iiiFnSymT 7  T 8 The actual text on the tablet (<span class='AOHittite'>me-mi</text:span>,<span class='AOHittite'></text:span> 2SG.IMP of <span class='AOHittite'>memai-</text:span>) would require a double emendation of the previous <span class='AOHittite'>nam-ma-at-ta</text:span> in <span class='AOHittite'>nam-ma-aš</text:span><span class='corr'>!</text:span><span class='AOHittite'>-ši</text:span><span class='corr'>!</text:span> (as discussed in Hout Th.P.J. van den 2010b, 398-399; “Furthermore, tell him<span class='d'>!</text:span> as follows: …”). For this reason, emendation of the verb as <span class='AOHittite'>te</text:span><span class='corr'>!</text:span><span class='AOHittite'>-mi</text:span> (1SG.PRS of <span class='AOHittite'>te-</text:span>) seems necessary.