iiiFnSym 0 1
 iiiFnSym 1 2
 iiiFnSym 2 3
 iiiFnSym 3 4
 iiiFnSym 4 5
 iiiFnSym 5 6
 iiiFnSym 6 7
 iiiFnSymT 0  T 1 Hitt. <span class='del'>[</text:span><span class='AOHittite'>nu menaḫḫanda</text:span> (/<span class='sGr'>IGI-</text:span><span class='AOHittite'>anda</text:span>) <span class='AOHittite'>laḫla<span class='del'>]</text:span>ḫḫimaš</text:span> <span class='sGr'>MUŠEN</text:span><span class='d'>ḪI.A</text:span> <span class='aGr'>NIMUR</text:span> (e.g. KBo 40.270+ (Frg. 4 + Frg. 3) obv. I 7′/8; KUB 49.52 rev. 13′; KUB 18.12+ (Frg. 1) obv. 15).
 iiiFnSymT 1  T 2 Typically, after the description of a bird perching, and of the position of its beak, the next sentence describes the bird taking off and flying in a new direction.
 iiiFnSymT 2  T 3 Tentative. Since this paragraph contains a short report, it might be a control oracle.
 iiiFnSymT 3  T 4 <span class='AOHittite'>=aš</text:span> refers most likely to the bird. This formulary for the augural response is atypical (cf. the expected sentences elsewhere in the text, <span class='AOHittite'>ḫantaittat=wa</text:span> ‘it was confirmed’ and <span class='AOHittite'>arḫa=wa peššer</text:span> ‘they excluded’).
 iiiFnSymT 4  T 5 Strangely, the verb here must have preceded <span class='AOHittite'>anda</text:span> in lacuna (see Sakuma Y. 2009b, II, 623: … <span class='aGr'>IK-ŠU-UD</text:span> <span class='AOHittite'>na-at e-re-er<span class='del'>]</text:span> an-da</text:span>, instead of <span class='AOHittite'>na-at an-da e-re-er</text:span>).
 iiiFnSymT 5  T 6 See previous <span class='AOHittite'>kolon</text:span> 17.
 iiiFnSymT 6  T 7 Tentative; Sakuma Y. 2009b, II, 625.