iiiFnSym 0 1
 iiiFnSym 1 2
 iiiFnSym 2 3
 iiiFnSym 3 4
 iiiFnSym 4 5
 iiiFnSym 5 6
 iiiFnSym 6 7
 iiiFnSym 7 8
 iiiFnSym 8 9
 iiiFnSym 9 10
 iiiFnSym 10 11
 iiiFnSym 11 12
 iiiFnSymT 0  T 1 Alternatively, <span class='AOHittite'>urayanni-</text:span>.
 iiiFnSymT 1  T 2 Cf. e.g. (Frg. 2) obv. II 14´, and <span class='AO--italic'>passim</text:span>.
 iiiFnSymT 2  T 3 Cf. (Frg. 2) obv. III 3´, etc. “… in Kizzuwatna”. However, Sakuma Y. 2009b, II, 592-603, understood these sentences as referring to the augurs’ place of origin: “<span class='del'>[</text:span>…<span class='del'>]</text:span> aus Uda” and “Nuwašarpa aus Kizzuwatn<span class='del'>[</text:span>a<span class='del'>]</text:span>” (obv. III 3´). See <span class='AO--italic'>Introductio</text:span>.
 iiiFnSymT 3  T 4 Thus Sakuma Y. 2009b, II, 593; alternatively, we can consider <span class='sGr'>EGIR-</text:span><span class='AOHittite'>pa</text:span> in the context of a typical oracular formulary, referring to an area of the observation field: “For the Chief of the Body Guard: because a <span class='AOHittite'>ḫaštapi-</text:span> bird <span class='del'>[</text:span>came/flew<span class='del'>]</text:span> in the back <span class='del'>[</text:span>…<span class='del'>]</text:span>”.
 iiiFnSymT 4  T 5 Sakuma Y. 2009b, II, 593: <span class='del'>[</text:span><span class='AOHittite'>nu-za</text:span> <span class='sGr'>EGIR-</text:span><span class='AOHittite'>pa da-a-aš</text:span><span class='del'>]</text:span> “it turned back”.
 iiiFnSymT 5  T 6 Unless this is an atypical spelling for the name <span class='AOHittite'>ḫar(r)ani-</text:span>, a different kind of bird.
 iiiFnSymT 6  T 7 Thus also Goedegebuure P. 2014a, 132, or, in military sense, “campaing” (e.g. Beal R.H. 1992a, 339 n. 1295; Bawanypeck D. 2014a, 98). The presence of the 3PL.ACC encl. <span class='AOHittite'>=uš</text:span> at the beginning of the sentence is difficult to explain. It might be a mistake, since one expects <span class='AOHittite'>na-aš</text:span> (as observed also Hout Th.P.J. van den 2001c, 435 n. 60).
 iiiFnSymT 7  T 8 The name is spelled in this text as both an -a and -i stem (cf. <span class='AOHittite'>Ḫuḫašarpa</text:span> obv. II 14´; <span class='AOHittite'>Ḫuḫašarpi</text:span> obv. II 23´, also 24´).
 iiiFnSymT 8  T 9 See obv. II 14´ and rev. III 7´-8´.
 iiiFnSymT 9  T 10 See obv. II 16´.
 iiiFnSymT 10  T 11 <span class='AOHittite'>tān namma</text:span> (see CHD L-N, 383 d).
 iiiFnSymT 11  T 12 The sentence can be translated as a question, or as a statement such as “<span class='del'>[</text:span><span class='AO--italic'>we inquired whether</text:span><span class='del'>]</text:span> for precisely this reason he died”. Sakuma Y. 2009b, II, 599 pointed out that the meaning of <span class='sGr'>DINGIR</text:span><span class='aGr'>-LIM</text:span> … <span class='AOHittite'>kikkišta</text:span> could be either “he died” (through the euphemism “became a god”) or “he became <span class='del'>[</text:span>a man/possession of<span class='del'>]</text:span> the deity”. The subject of the sentence is unclear, but the dream which Šuḫera saw (III 4-8) was apparently a serious matter, and the augurs are investigating this sign thoroughly. It is possible that the issue is precisely that someone died in the dream, and that this had already been made clear in the missing portion of the previous paragraph.
 iiiFnSymT 12  T 13 For the meaning of <span class='AOHittite'>andurza epp-</text:span>, rarely attested in other bird oracles, see <span class='AO--italic'>Introductio</text:span>.