iiiFnSym 0 1
 iiiFnSym 1 2
 iiiFnSym 2 3
 iiiFnSym 3 4
 iiiFnSym 4 5
 iiiFnSym 5 6
 iiiFnSym 6 7
 iiiFnSym 7 8
 iiiFnSym 8 9
 iiiFnSymT 0  T 1 Perhaps mistaken for a plural (ACC?) (similarly Cognetti C. 2021a, 282 n. 859).
 iiiFnSymT 1  T 2 Uncertain; in this sentence, we would expect the deity Zawalli to be the direct object, “consulted; determined” by oracle (for the usage of <span class='AOHittite'>ariye/a-</text:span> with gods as direct objects, see e.g. also KUB 5.21 obv.? 5). However, the name of the god(s) should be in accusative, since the verb is apparently an active form. We should consider a mistake, unless the Zawalli deity truly is the one who “consults (an oracle); determines (by oracle)”.
 iiiFnSymT 2  T 3 For the word order in this sentence, and particularly of the indefinite pronoun and <span class='AOHittite'>anda</text:span>, see Sideltsev A.V. 2015b, 224.
 iiiFnSymT 3  T 4 In context <span class='sGr'>É</text:span> <span class='sGr'>LUGAL</text:span> (‘house of the king’) might not mean ‘palace’ (the building): if the Zawalli deities are to be considered personal deities of some sort (whether they have to do with the dead or not), this definition might refer to the royal ‘house’ with the meaning ‘royal family; dynasty’. This seems to be also the opinion of Cognetti C. 2021a, 282 (“ein Zawalli vom Haus des Königs”), with ref. to CHD P, 176-177 a.
 iiiFnSymT 4  T 5 Sakuma Y. 2009b, II, 90 interprets the only word (<span class='sGr'>SI×SÁ</text:span><span class='AOHittite'>-at</text:span>) written in the first paragraph of column III as part of the response from the previous paragraph at the end of column II. This is possible, even though, if this text belonged to the “word” of the augurs, one would expect the <span class='AOHittite'>=wa(r)</text:span> particle (cf. obv. I 9´, 18´). An interpretation remains difficult.
 iiiFnSymT 5  T 6 if one were to restore <span class='del'>[</text:span><span class='sGr'>GID<span class='del'>]</text:span>IM:</text:span> “<span class='AO--italic'>Of the deceased</text:span>”. Instead, if the text was <span class='AOHittite'><span class='del'>[</text:span>nu kuiš kuiš<span class='del'>]</text:span>,</text:span> the text would read: “<span class='del'>[</text:span>Which<span class='del'>]</text:span>ever Zawalli deity was …”. Differently, Cognetti C. 2021a, 283: <span class='del'>[</text:span><span class='AOHittite'>nu ta-ma-i<span class='del'>]</text:span>š</text:span><span class='corr'>?</text:span> “The other Zawalli, who …”.
 iiiFnSymT 6  T 7 According to Sakuma Y. 2009b, II, 91: “<span class='del'>[</text:span>down from the unfavorable side<span class='del'>]</text:span>” (‘rules’ of flight directions).
 iiiFnSymT 7  T 8 Cf. Hout Th.P.J. van den 1998c, 155: “will they undo her (influence)?”.