iiiFnSym 0 1
 iiiFnSym 1 2
 iiiFnSym 2 3
 iiiFnSym 3 4
 iiiFnSym 4 5
 iiiFnSym 5 6
 iiiFnSymT 0  T 1 The question most likely belongs to a series of inquiries on this issue, as the subsequent questions narrow down the scope of the problem (cf. obv. 7´, obv. 14´); thus also Sakuma Y. 2009b, II 222.
 iiiFnSymT 1  T 2 While the restoration is supported by the parallel sentence in obv.? 9´, see one instance of elliptic 〈<span class='AOHittite'>šeḫur〉 tarnaš</text:span> in KUB 16.47, 22´ (CTH 573.64), where the object of ‘to release’ is only implied.
 iiiFnSymT 2  T 3 Or: “… are <span class='AO--italic'>somehow</text:span> angered about …”.
 iiiFnSymT 3  T 4 Based on the answer in <span class='AO--italic'>kolon</text:span> 23, and the next question, <span class='AO--italic'>k.</text:span> 24-25.
 iiiFnSymT 4  T 5 Sakuma Y. 2009b, II 223.
 iiiFnSymT 5  T 6 Differently from Sakuma Y. 2009b, II 224: “Wenn du, … <span class='AO--italic'>nur</text:span> wegen des Inneres des Tempels <span class='AO--italic'>und der Feste</text:span> <span class='del'>[</text:span>zornig (bist)<span class='del'>]</text:span>” (my emphasis). In consideration of the following formula (“let the birds exclude (it)”), a negation is perhaps preferable in the protasis. This interpretation also provides a more logical follow-up to the previous question in obv. 7´, leading the inquiry into other possible causes of the goddess’ anger.
 iiiFnSymT 6  T 7 Since this question does not seem to add further details beyond the previous sentences, could it be that this is not the ‘Sun Goddess of Arinna’, but another deity?