iiiFnSym 0 1
 iiiFnSym 1 2
 iiiFnSymT 0  T 1 Sakuma Y. 2009b, II, 431 (and 710-711) reads <span class='AOHittite'><span class='del'>[</text:span>M<span class='del'>]</text:span>auri</text:span> (also obv. 13´, also fragmentary), understanding it as an alternative spelling of the augur’s name <span class='d'>m</text:span><span class='AOHittite'>Ma-wi₅-ri</text:span> (KUB 22.45 obv. 30´; KUB 49.56 obv. 12´). However, the reading is epigraphically unlikely.
 iiiFnSymT 1  T 2 “<span class='del'>[</text:span>there is no danger/nothing to fear<span class='del'>]</text:span>” <span class='AO--italic'>vel sim</text:span>.
 iiiFnSymT 2  T 3 Either “in front” or “in the back up”. Based on frequency rules, Sakuma Y. 2009b, II, 695 considers “in front” more likely.
 iiiFnSymT 3  T 4 Either “in front” or “in the back down”. Based on frequency rules, Sakuma Y. 2009b, II, 688 considers “in the back down” more likely.
 iiiFnSymT 4  T 5 Mistake in the text, which requires 3SG.NOM.C <span class='AOHittite'>=aš</text:span>.
 iiiFnSymT 5  T 6 For this interpretation of <span class='sGr'>ÉRIN</text:span><span class='d'>MEŠ</text:span> <span class='sGr'>ŠU-</text:span><span class='aGr'>TI</text:span> (formerly <span class='sGr'>ÉRIN</text:span><span class='d'>MEŠ</text:span> <span class='aGr'>ŠU-TI</text:span>) see Melchert H.C. 2024a. A discussion in <span class='AO--italic'>Introductio</text:span>.
 iiiFnSymT 6  T 7 Or, possibly, with a different analysis: <span class='sGr'>KUR</text:span> <span class='d'>URU</text:span><span class='AOHittite'>Pita=ma</text:span> “but in the land of Pita …”. Either toponyms are <span class='AO--italic'>hapax</text:span> (cf. possibly <span class='d'>PÚ</text:span><span class='AOHittite'>Pita</text:span> in KuT 60, I 11'; A. Kryszeń, HiTop).
 iiiFnSymT 7  T 8 Tentative, see rev. 5´.