Citatio: Thesaurus Linguarum Hethaeorum digitalis, hethiter.net/: TLHdig DBH 43/2.97 (2021-12-31)

obv.? 1′ 1 ]x

obv.? 2′ 2 ]x


obv.? 3′ 3 ]

obv.? 4′ 4 EG]IR?-paagain:ADV

EG]IR?-pa
again
ADV

obv.? 5′ 5 S]IG₅-duto become good:3SG.IMP

S]IG₅-du
to become good
3SG.IMP

obv.? 6′ 6 S]IG₅well:NOM.SG(UNM)


S]IG₅
well
NOM.SG(UNM)

obv.? 7′ 7 ]x GALlarge:NOM.SG(UNM);
grandee:NOM.SG(UNM);
grandee:ACC.SG(UNM);
grandee:GEN.SG(UNM);
grandee:D/L.SG(UNM);
grandee:ALL(UNM);
grandee:ABL(UNM);
grandee:INS(UNM);
grandee:VOC.SG(UNM)
x

GAL
large
NOM.SG(UNM)
grandee
NOM.SG(UNM)
grandee
ACC.SG(UNM)
grandee
GEN.SG(UNM)
grandee
D/L.SG(UNM)
grandee
ALL(UNM)
grandee
ABL(UNM)
grandee
INS(UNM)
grandee
VOC.SG(UNM)

obv.? 8′ 8 ] NU.SIG₅unfavourable (abbr. for kuštayaz(a)):NOM.SG(UNM)

NU.SIG₅
unfavourable (abbr. for kuštayaz(a))
NOM.SG(UNM)

obv.? blank line


obv.? 9′ 9 ]xMEŠ SIG₅-ruto put in order; to become good:3SG.IMP.MP

SIG₅-ru
to put in order
to become good
3SG.IMP.MP

obv.? blank line


obv.? 10′ 10 ]-a?

obv.? 11′ 11 ] da-pí-isicentire:QUANall.D/L.SG ZI-nisoul:D/L.SG.C

da-pí-isicZI-ni
entire
QUANall.D/L.SG
soul
D/L.SG.C

obv.? 12′! 12 ] NU.SIG₅unfavourable (abbr. for kuštayaz(a)):NOM.SG(UNM)1


NU.SIG₅
unfavourable (abbr. for kuštayaz(a))
NOM.SG(UNM)

obv.? 13′! 13 ]x-ma

obv.? blank line


obv.? 14′! 14 ]-la?-iš

obv.? 15′! 15 ] SIG₅well:NOM.SG(UNM)

obv.? breaks off

SIG₅
well
NOM.SG(UNM)

rev.? ca. six broken lines

rev.? 1′ 16 ]-an ar-ḫaaway from:PREV

ar-ḫa
away from
PREV

rev.? blank line


rev.? 2′ 17 ]x-ú?2 [

rev.? 3′ 18 ] tar-liš(oracle term and divine epithet):NOM.SG.C(ABBR) NI-MURto see:1PL.PST

tar-lišNI-MUR
(oracle term and divine epithet)
NOM.SG.C(ABBR)
to see
1PL.PST

rev.? 4′ 19 ]x-ḫi-eš

rev.? 5′ 20 ] pa-itto go:3SG.PST

pa-it
to go
3SG.PST

rev.? 6′ 21 ]-za x x

rev.? 7′ 22 ]-ma?[

rev.? 8′ 23 ] x x [

rev.? breaks off

⸢NU⸣.SIG₅ squeezed between l. 11´ and the paragraph line, on the tablet′s edge, and was omitted in autography.
If this is Ú , it is oddly written here, with the first vertical quite distanced from the last two; is this meant to be KI!.MIN? On the basis of the traces on photographs, this could be also S]IG₅-ru?, but quite uncertain.
0.80956411361694