Restoration suggested by Hout Th.P.J. van den 1998c, 227 on the basis of a similar passages in KUB 50.6 rev. III 1–6 (cf. also obv. II 36′–41′).

Restoration suggested by Hout Th.P.J. van den 1998c , 227 on the basis of a similar passages in KUB 50.6 rev. III 1–6 (cf. also obv. II 36′–41′). However, according to the photo and the handcopy of Durand published in FHL, the reading of the partly broken sign at the beginning of the word is not completely certain.

Possible restorations are AŠ-R]I, A-N]A, or Š]A. The similar passages in KUB 50.6+ obv. II 36–40 and rev. III 1–5 speak in favor of the restoration AŠ-R]I, although the term is followed there by the plural determinative ḪI.A.