Citatio: M. Cammarosano (ed.), hethiter.net/: CTH 528.15 (TX 2016-06-03)
KBo 8.56
§
1′
1′
[GALḪI.A-ká]n(?)
⸢aš-ša-nu-wa-an-zi
nu-ká[n
… ]
2′ [
(1-2 signs)
]-an-ma
GE₆-an-za
iš-tar-ni-ia
ḫa-a-l[i
… ]
3′
[GI]Šma-a-ri-uš
ME-an-zi
na-at
I-NA [
… ]
4′
⸢1?⸣
DUGTU₇-aš
TU₇.Ì
3
DUG
KAŠ
30
NINDA
ME-an-z[i
(vacat?) ]
5′
GALḪI.A-kán
aš-ša-nu-wa-an-zi
GIŠm[a-ri-aš(?)]
6′
KA×U-i-iš
iš-tap-pa-an-zi
nu
1
DUG [
… ]
7′
ME-an-zi
na-aš
EGIR-pa
A-NA
DINGIR-LI[M
ti-an-zi(?)
(vacat?) ]
8′
ki-nu-na
LÚMEŠ
URUta-ri-ia-t[a? 1 Or: G[A].(-)
… ]
9′
ma-a-an
ku-u-un
EZEN₄
ša-ra-a
x[
… ]
10′
Ú-UL-kán
ku-it-ki
da-a-liš-kán-z[i
… ]
11′
⸢SIG₅⸣
ME-an
*⸢na-at
Asic-NA⸣(?)* 2 According to Berman 1982: 95 fn. 7, these signs are written over an erasure (not marked as such in the copy). [
… ]
12′ [
… ]
NU
SIG₅ 3 The traces of wedges visible in the copy are seemigly scratches, so Berman 1982: 95 fn. 8.
(rest of the preserved portion of column uninscribed)