Or, possibly, mdu-ud-du-wa.
Previous readers suggest m.DI[M- but the available space might allow only m.D10-[.
Hoffner H.A. 2009a, 185 restored [e-eš-du] at the end of obv. 5. This is certainly the implied verb, but the distribution of the signs on this line, almost entirely preserved, suggests that the text is complete. For a possible parallel, see KuT 50 obv. 3 (although the verb, in this case, is explicit in the following sentence, obv. 4).
|