The sign rather looks like -ṣú- in 2′, but after a genitive we’d expect -šu.
|
The writing DU.DU for illak is found regularly in the Boghazköy-texts (e. g. KBo 36.47, rev. III 8’). It is also found in Middle Babylonian omens from Susa (MDP 57.6, IV 44).
The phrasesilurēṣūt X illak, X arbūtamillak, and awīluelibēlawātīšuizzazare common in second-millennium extispicy omens(KAL 5.42, obv. II 5 (weapon)); KAL 5.60-61, obv. 16’(lungs); YOS 10.33, 32 (finger).The fragmentary state of the tablet unfortunately makes it difficult to find entirely identical omens elsewhere.
The sign read iš/eš₁₅ in SAG-eš₁₅? looks the same as ṣú in l. 2′, but after a preposition, the form rēšīšu is expected. The plene spelling ṣa-a-bi-itin the stative is also unexpected. Short vowels in plene writing are occasionally found in Southern Old Babylonian and Sealand omen texts ( George A.R. 2013a: 54.89.137). Other instances of unexpected in-word plene spellings are e. g. KUB 4.66 col. ii7.
|