With Sakuma Y. 2009b, II, 457. The first sign is difficult to read, while the second appears to be PU (see also the handcopy in KBo 40).
Following Sakuma Y. 2009b, II, 457. Likely restoration, in reason of the content of the next line.
|
Sakuma Y. 2009b, II, 457 restores: ⸢ú?⸣-[it nu-za GAM-an mar-ša-na-aš-ši-in] [tar.-li₁₂-an] IK-ŠU-UD. For this restoration see the content of lines 5´-6´.
Sakuma Y. 2009b, II, 457 restores: [UM-MA UGULA/GAL LÚ.]MEŠIGI.MUŠEN, although it cannot be excluded that more than one augur mentioned by name were responsible; see e.g. the oracles in KBo 40.378+ (CTH 573.30), signed by “Armapiya and the augurs”.
|