Or: ]-⸢e?⸣-ma.
The reading p[a- in Tischler J. 2019a, 62 is unlikely, based on the standard formulary.
The restoration suggested by Tischler J. 2019a, 62: EGIR.KASKAL]-NI(?) is quite unlikely in context.
Or N[I?-MUR.
Tischler J. 2019a, 63 suggests ša[l-wi₅-ni- but the photos show only a single angular wedge at the beginning of this word.
|
For a possible context, see a similar passage in KBo 4.6 obv. 16´-18´; rev. 21´-23´ (Prayer to Lelwani for Gaššuliyawiya). There, the matter concerns an illness of the Queen, and the “separation” is understood in ritual terms – to detach the illness and carry it away (see Rieken E. 1999a, 109).
|