|
Abschnitt 1ID=1: Address formula |
| 1ID=1 | -- | Say to the Queen, our lady. |
| 2ID=2 | -- | Thus (say) Awauwā, Nukkaribum,1 Tarḫuntaššu, and the augurs, your servants. |
Abschnitt 2ID=2: Oracle reports |
| 3ID=3 | -- | Away2 from Ḫaitta: an uriyanni- bird (was) taru(yali-). |
| 4ID=4 | -- | Down at the river Zuliya […] birds (were/came) GUN-li- lengthways. |
| 5ID=5 | -- | From the favorable side we conjure3 it in[to/side …], |
| 6ID=6 | -- | and back […]. |
| 7ID=7 | -- | An eagle (came)4 in front from the favorable side. |
| 8ID=8 | -- | [An uri]yanni- bird flew taru(yali-) diagonally. |
| 9ID=9 | -- | [At the river Zu]liya and at the river Imralla [a bird …] and an alila- bird (were) GUN-li-. |
| 10ID=10 | -- | […] it is attached.5 |
| 11ID=11 | -- | […] |
| 12ID=12 | -- | […] taru(yali-) |
| 13ID=13 | -- | […] |
obv. breaks off |
| 14ID=14 | -- | […] in fr[ont] |
| 15ID=15 | -- | […] it flew [di]agonally |
| 16ID=16 | -- | […] bird(s) (came) GUN-li- lengthways from the favorable side. |
| 17ID=17 | -- | we [observed these birds].6 |
Abschnitt 3ID=3: ‘Piggyback’ letter from one of the senders to his sons |
| 18ID=18 | -- | Thus (says) NU.GIŠKIRI₆. |
| 19ID=19 | -- | Say to Tumnī, Tumnaziti and Tuttuwaili, my dear sons. |
| 20ID=20 | -- | Since I have just sent word to the palace about the situation of my house |
| 21ID=21 | -- | my dear sons, rescue me! |
| 22ID=22 | -- | Tell it to the palace! |
| 23ID=23 | -- | And how they talk a[t the p]alace |
| 24ID=24 | -- | wri[te (it) to me], my de[ar sons]! |
|
Tentative, Akkadian reading of Sum. mNU.GIŠKIRI₆.
In my view, this sentence refers to the location where the observation happened, somewhere “away” from this town. For an exact parallel, see DAAM 1.21 obv. 4, URUḫariyašaz=kan arḫa [ ] (CTH 581.29): since this sentence is complete as such, it shows that arḫa cannot be understood in reference to bird movements (as previously Sakuma Y. 2009b, II, 636, “Von Ḫaitta (flog) ein urianni-Vogel im tar.-(Bereich) weg”, who did not have access to this fragment, more recenlty published). Such interpretation can be also excluded due to the position of the adverb, incompatible with the typical formulary, and the implausible omission of the mandatory verb pa(i)-. For a similar use of arḫa in reference to the location of the observation, see also KuT 49, obv. 19, lo. e. 30 (edition CTH 190.1). According to Hagenbuchner A. 1989a, 84 the verb ḫuek- in context is perhaps to be interpreted as a mistaken form of ḫuešk-, imperfective of ḫuwai- ‘to run (after)’ (cfr. KBo 11.51, III 9), rather than ḫuek- ‘to conjure’ (or, less likely ‘to slaughter’). Accordingly, she translated: “…werden wir beständig [hinter]her laufen.” Parallel uses of ḫuek- in oracular context exclude this interpretation (e.g. KUB 18.12+ obv. 13); still, the meaning of these actions in these passages is difficult to assess. HW2 Ḫ 619 lists the form under ‘beschwören’; Kloekhorst A. 2008a ‘to conjure, treat by incantation’. Czyzewska I.S. 2007a, 151 suggested [pa-it … ] but this is not possible: whether it was expressed in the gap of the following line or, more likely, omitted (see also obv. 4, 6), the verb here could only be uet.
|
|
